BLOG

Some is certainly concerned with the philosophy of aesthetics.

Oct 29, 2018by Realty Decoded

Originally Posted by i_feel_tiredsleepy I don’t think so…It depends on the art. I don’t know of any art that does this. Originally Posted by Daecon Why would a fantasy starship engine need a weakness?Weaknesses are for people, not technologies.I do concede, however, that technology without limitations can lead to poor plot resolution (becoming a deus ex machine) or even leading to “Magical Computer” scenarios. This is the transition from statistics to thermodynamics.3.

I don’t know of any art that does this. Related Discussions:MC Escher Fan ClubDali on relativity ?actual philosophyWe see in 2 dimensions?to have something p.p.Why is Art important?Natural fencesHow is morals adressed when you study philosophy?Post a picture of yourself so we can seePhilosophy of Plato Who at the time were considered as craftsmen, like carpenters.While here Margritte’s famous painting is playing with linguistics, so there are more philosophical concerns at work: Some is certainly concerned with the philosophy of aesthetics. It thought about a gravity drive once. People are entitled to such, even if you disagree with them. I don’t think so…It depends on the art.

You can also tilt your ship in the direction you wanna go without thrusters.Weakness: You run on a type of compressed gasoline. Because those are my opinions. thank you for the corrections i had my doubts about the theory however i know im drifting into the realms of philosophy here but consider instead of mankind maybe a sentient being that can see and understand everything (im not talking about god iim just hypothetically suggesting) if there was a being that could see every minute particle, every exact position, every field, every speed, every force and understood the chemistry of reactions compltetely. also being able to calculate faster than the rate of the reactions.if there is a perfect rhyme and reason to all the interactions of particles could this being not predict the future?i apologize if im showing complete ignorance here or if ive moved completely off topic im just curious. thank you for your time however. Originally Posted by montazar i’m wondering how a person lets him\her self talk bullshits like you…

I don’t know of any art that does this. That is what it’s like. It’s perfect. But if we were to input for example as you said 3 atoms, two hydrogens and an oxygen, we know the input, therefore able to determine the output. Some is more technically concerned.The 17th century Dutch masters of still-life painting didn’t seem to have much going on philosophically.Here is one of Mignon’s still-lifes, this is all about the visual effect and the colours, and the technical mastery of the artist.

The only weakness that it won’t work when the person is sleeping. It doesn’t occur naturally in space. All three assumptions are wrong.1. But if you were to predict the future based on the chemical reactions of our brain, you would have to calculate the input; this would have to be the exact balance of neurochemicals to produce an accurate reading.

Some art may explore the ‘meaning’ of life, which some people equate to philosophy, but it’s not. Some is more technically concerned.The 17th century Dutch masters of still-life painting didn’t seem to have much going on philosophically.Here is one of Mignon’s still-lifes, this is all about the visual effect and the colours, and the technical mastery of the artist. But I guess it is all about finding out how and why things work. Who at the time were considered as craftsmen, like carpenters.While here Margritte’s famous painting is playing with linguistics, so there are more philosophical concerns at work: Many artists just paint to sell. Or try to start a new trend. if you’re of the belief that conciousness is a part of our brain and not a supernatural force then this theory may interest you.consider a chemical reaction between two types of atoms, for example 2 hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom, every time 3 atoms of these types come into contact they will form a water molecule.the same is true for any number of any different types of atom, the reaction that takes place between certain atoms will always be the same therefore we can PREDICT the reaction that will take place and the end product.so say we knew the position of every atom in the universe , its nature and our knowledge of chemical reactions was absolute. we should be able to predict every single reaction and subsequent reaction that will take place in the universe, even the reactions in our own brains, such as the reaction that takes place in response to new information we recieve.if this https://www.google.com/search?ei=WlLUW5yGHNOtgAaQo6KABg&q=custom+thesis+paper theory is true we could predict the future by calculating the reactions, therefore we have an atomic destiny!please feel free to comment, support or even dismantle my theory!

How about an Omnidirectional Exo-Gravitation Array?An ODEGA will let you generate a “pocket” of gravity in whichever direction you want to travel, so your spaceship just “falls” forwards/backwards/sideways/etc. That means if it carries a 1000 gallons it can fly for years. Nonetheless when you run out, you run out.

This thread is from 10 years ago. In fact you won’t be going anywhere. Well a lot of art deals with the philosophy of aesthetics by challenging our concepts of aesthetic taste. Originally Posted by montazar you dare talking this way about islam? For one, you’re replying to a thread that’s over a decade old.

Originally Posted by Prometheus Philosophy is a pursuit of knowledge via deductive reasoning. Originally Posted by shlunka Four wheel drive son. Originally Posted by MiguelSR1 The 2 always go hand in hand, as in art is philosophy in picture form. discuss That might be true, in that I am discursive essay ideas higher
interested in the bible , science, art and music.( no talent in music, a little in art.) There is an equilibrium of reactions.2. Actually I made a living as an artist for a number of years. Related Discussions:Mars Odyssey Themis ImagesWhere do we come from?Evidence for expansion of the universe?Your favorite quotesAfterlife, Underwold aand HellMore New Research further implicates Sun and Cosmic Raysthe purpose of physics is to predict the futureCosmic Rays and Global WarmingCosmic godsAnyone studying Maritime History? Some art may explore the ‘meaning’ of life, which some people equate to philosophy, but it’s not. These are sub-light drives you pick for maneuvering (warp drive is a given).Newtonian Orion Drive: newtonian maneuvers via nuclear fusion and also by blowing up nukes in space for your massive reaction thrust.Weakness: It does newtonian maneuvers.

Originally Posted by Daecon How about an Omnidirectional Exo-Gravitation Array?An ODEGA will let you generate a “pocket” of gravity in whichever direction you want to travel, so your spaceship just “falls” forwards/backwards/sideways/etc. Stupid had no statute of limitation Four wheel drive son. Super compressed so your ship can carry more of it.

Especially, 20th century art is often self-reflective in this way.Art itself isn’t philosophy, but it often requires we apply philosophical ideas to it. gotta love the last sentence 😀 So I prefer drives that have some weakness in them.I thought of a drive that is essentially powered by a telekinetic person. Those reactions are not deterministic on an atomic level. Because your in space, your ship won’t stop even if you turn off your engine, not unless you put on the brakes. But something that’s “only” a propulsion system is already pretty limited. Originally Posted by i_feel_tiredsleepy Originally Posted by Prometheus Philosophy is a pursuit of knowledge via deductive reasoning.

The only way to get more is at space gas stations. Although your tone does come off as frothing at the mouth in rage, so that doesn’t help matters. Weaknesses in propulsion systems affect society in fiction. You cannot predict the result of each reaction, only a probability. Especially, 20th century art is often self-reflective in this way.Art itself isn’t philosophy, but it often requires we apply philosophical ideas to it.

I’m wondering how a person like you can criticize another on the internet for sounding like an idiot when you yourself sound like at least the Duke of Idiots. Some is certainly concerned with the philosophy of aesthetics. If you consider that a downside. In fiction the problem is it HAS NO WEAKNESSES.

Personally I think all religion is bullshit and basically a con job. And in real life NOTHING is perfect. Two, a person can talk about Islam anyway they want (in most countries and online). Why would a fantasy starship engine need a weakness?Weaknesses are for people, not technologies.I do concede, however, that technology without limitations can lead to poor plot resolution (becoming a deus ex machine) or even leading to “Magical Computer” scenarios.

And you can’t have more than one telekinetic on board since they cancel each other out power wise.This, ships like these travel in packs of four, to rotate telekinetic powered people around. So long as your brakes are working, you can stop. Philosophy is a pursuit of knowledge via deductive reasoning.

Related Discussions:Destiny Vs free willWhat is Science’s basic definition of mass?Can we change our destiny if there is one?Your favorite quotesPurpose of life…atomic mass units – how so?Atomic radiiMy introis the atomic theory really…..whether we can live the life of another person? This seems impossible due to the fact that we cannot exactly predict the amounts of neurochemicals being produced.I think I wandered off topic, I seem to do that alot. Like I can say Islam is stupid. Some art may explore the ‘meaning’ of life, which some people equate to philosophy, but it’s not. Did some work for Hollywood and other things.

None of the original participants is still around. But something that’s “only” a propulsion system is already pretty limited. Not sure how to figure out a way of turning the ship around to face a different direction, probably with some technobabble like “torque manifold” or some such.

I like it cause it breaks physics and follows them at the same time. Just linear maneuvers with epic drift until you thrust in the opposite direction.Automobile Drive: Yeah I made it up, but science fiction demands it. Just think of a car that can tilt an imaginary road wherever it wanted to go and the wheels stuck to the road.

Not sure how to figure out a way of turning the ship around to face a different direction, probably with some technobabble like “torque manifold” or some such. I can also say Christianity is stupid as well. Quantum mechanics has a fundamental law (experimentally proved) saying that it is impossible to determine the exact position of a particle in space, and even more so if it is moving. They are a little surreal, and ethereal.

Well a lot of art deals with the philosophy of aesthetics by challenging our concepts of aesthetic taste. If you find it difficult to follow, you are not alone…. come back and ask some folow up questions Chemical reactions are not always the same. Enjoy this avi Spaceship has wheels that ride on an invisible floor from another dimension that ONLY interacts with your wheels. The answer is ‘no’.Do a search on quantum theory which has been tested and is a mainstay of physics. Also, if your wheels aren’t spinning, then you won’t be doing any tilting of your ship.

Related Discussions:Which Drive Would You Pick For A Starship?FlyingAntimatter Bomb?what makes a good starshipWould Increasing The Speed Of Light Be Safe?Will a starship be destroyed by dust?An FTL drive that avoids Einstein and the problems of relativity…AliensPaint your starshipTravelling at percentages of light speed The 2 always go hand in hand, as in art is philosophy in picture form. discuss It also means that it would be a prime target for pirate ships with smaller fuel tanks. But there are ones that go deeper in to it.The ones I’m doing lately I can not really explain , but that is why I painted them. No airplane maneuvers in space.

Say the automobile drive can drive for 4 months on a gallon of fuel.

Comments